Dating systems before christ sex dating in palmer illinois
The last chronological event written as history (as opposed to prophecy) is "the third year of Cyrus King of Persia," (Dan 10:1) which was 537 BC (pg. This, together with the first date, gives us reason to believe that the book was probably written/compiled, according to the author, sometime quite soon after 537 BC, as he would have been somewhere over eighty years old (pg. The historical evidences stem from arguments that have been alleged that there are historical errors or inaccuracies in Daniel.The evidences are counter-arguments which use recent archaeological findings to prove that Daniel is correct, and our previous information was incomplete.The literary arguments, for the most part, stem from contentions that many of the words used in Daniel are from an era much later than the sixth century, therefore the book couldn't have been written at that time.The counter-arguments for this type also uses recent findings to prove that the words used by Daniel can definitely have come from the sixth century, therefore their contentions are invalid.
It relates the fact that God is in control, and how He protects His faithful servants.The mention of him as the last king of Babylon in Daniel seemed to be an unreconcilable error to historians and critics.Secular sources have, since ancient times, stated that Nabonidus was the last king of Babylon (p. Then, with the discovery of the Nabonidus Chronicle, Daniel was proven correct.It is very likely that he himself would be referring to historical sources, such as Jeremiah, which uses the Palestinian dating system.Why would he have strayed from such an important and well-known prophet to use another, obscure dating system, which would appear to contradict Jeremiah, to his readers who read from, and knew the prophets work well (Waltke, pg. The second main historical argument concerns Belshazzar.